Water Savers | Econogics Blog | Products and Services | Electric Vehicles | Reducing Your Expenses | Personal Energy Plan | The Emperor's New Hydrogen Economy
Save 1/100th of a tree Also available at: |
Last updated 2025.10.16 Canada's Projects in the National Interest - Econogics commentaryThis began in August 2025 in the wake of the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) Advisory Notification on the liability of states (countries) for damages caused by their GHG emissions. Note: NOT the liability of the corporations generating those emissions for profit; the liability of the COUNTRIES where the emissions originated. This mean the costs will be incurred by taxpayers, not the corporations that received payments while producing the harmful emissions. This legal conclusion arrived at the same time as Canadian media were reporting Canadian fossil fuel companies were actively lobbying the federal government in closed door meetings to be at the front of the line for special consideration when the national projects management team had not even been announced to the public. When Canadian government resources (i.e. taxpayer funds) are the linchpin for any such undertakings, it is my opinion that ANY discussions should be open to all qualified contributors, and that the rules of engagement should be fair, transparent and truly in the NATIONAL interest, and not just a subset with privileged access. That led to me writing suggestions for an evaluation checklist which took into account the long-term national interest in light of the ICJ Advisory Notification, and requiring an explicit definition of what would be accepted as being in the national interest, that is, in the interest of Canadians broadly in the near term and taking into account the likely long-term consequences. I also offered up some sample projects that would really be in the national interest, but would likely not have a private sector proponent. Start here: link to the first document: Cover letter for the document above (PDF 2 pages) My intention in the months to come is to address some of the national projects which will be announced, and also write up some topics that are unlikely to be taken up the Major Projects Office, but perhaps should be. Unfortunately, given the apparent state of the conversation the federal government is having with fossil fuel lobbyists and ignoring civil society and its own citizens, it is necessary to sweep some trash off the table to make room for rational discussion. Clearing Some 'National Interest' TrashMy List of Worthy Projects in the National Interest for Canada (2025)** denotes this project content is not in place yet. Data Sovereignty and Security (includes data centres and powering them, AI takes 20 times the power and water in the same footprint)Summary and ** link National High Speed BroadbandSummary and ** link Strategic National Commodities ReservesWill need to build a list of categories with strategiesSummary and ** link If you have additional categories of resources which are strategic and shuld be included here, let me know Anthropogenic Methane Capture, Utilization, Storage (and destruction) (AMCUS)Summary (no document link for this topic - if you want to discuss it, get in touch with me.) This project will be a far more effective way to reduce the global warming potential of current greenhouse gas emissions than any CCUS fantasy currently being proposed, and won't require additional research on effective means of doing long-term CO2 sequestration, err, I mean storage. Implementation sites will generally be near populated areas, so will improve air quality near many Canadians. AMCUS relies on existing technology, has a ready, profitable market in place, and would turn a profit. There's even a federal government incentive to do this. (So far, don't be surprised if it's killed as an 'austerity measure' in the fall 2025 budget.) A demonstration project in Ottawa (Trail Road Landfill site) is highly successful producing green electricity fed to the Ontario electrical grid, earning revenue for the City of Ottawa. And for some reason, lots of garbage trucks run on fossil methane ('clean'), so they could fill up with anthropogenic methane at old dump sites. Capturing anthropogenic methane leaks and burning the gas provides a factor 100 improvement in GWP on the 10-year time frame. It could even reduce municipal operating costs by using 'free' methane instead of pipeline fossil methane from the U.S. Using that fuel productively (e.g. to power a truck) would reduce GHG emissions even further by displacing use of other fossil hydrocarbon fuels such as gasoline or diesel. We have the methane satellites now (e.g. GHGSat), and airborne methane sensing and ground level methane detectors to locate more anthrogenic methane sources. In the unlikely event that the demand for low-cost anthropogenic methane should exceed the supply, we can produce more anthropogenic methane using crop waste and algal bloom biomass biodigestion and composting to make soil amendment (fertilizer plus) without extracting more hydrocarbons) link to marine biomass paper. See my White Paper To close, Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage is a futile exercise. It's an industry green-washing campaign which at best kicks the can down the road (the stored CO2 will eventually leak out of any storage method currently being proposed), at significant cost to taxpayers. In reality, CCUS was originally invented in Canada as an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) technology. The CO2 is pumped into an aging oil field to increase pressure and oil recovery rates. The kicker is that the same CO2 is then brought up the wells with the produced oil, gas, water and other substances, and released into the atmosphere at some point in the production process, thus actually INCREASING CO2 emissions via increased oil production and the re-emission of the injected CO2 into the oilfield. find Weyburn document as reference. Disclosure: I have submitted comments to the ECCC Carbon Credits / GHG Reduction program, and my application to be a volunteer for guiding the program was rejected due to 'lack of industry experience'. I found that curious as Canada had no methane destruction or related credits industry at the time. It did have a strong and influential oil and gas extraction, processing and sales industry, and still does. It also rejected my suggestion that the GWP number for methane be changed from 25 to 100 to reflect the GWP-10 number set by the UNIPCC a very long time ago. This program issued its first credits in 2025, but their is no market or exchange established for them.National Grid (only RE from here on)Summary and ** link HousingHousing affordability has been a hot topic in Canada for pretty much a decade now, muted a bit by COVID-19, but back in the headlines again now. It's big and complicated, and impacted by general state of the economy, population growth, speculative land development practices and new home sales weighting high margin cosmetics over basic, robust construction practice. RESTCo has done considerable research and work on creating energy efficient, healthy, affordable, robust housing which is designed to be adaptable to climate change consequences like permafrost melt, sea level rise and shoreline erosion, so why not start there for an overview? Food SovereigntySummary and ** link Plastic Pollution Reduction and RemovalPlastic pollution is a serious and growing issue in terms of human health and environmental
impact. For a grounding on the subject, I recommend
RESTCo's web pages on the topic. Energy SovereigntyIf Canada needs one fossil fuel pipeline - and it probably doesn't - it would be for western natural gas to get to Ontario, routed north of the Great Lakes. Almost all of Ontario's natural gas comes from the United States. With the current U.S. regime in power, if they felt that this fossil methane supply was a pressure point for Ontario, they will undoubtedly threaten to turn it off, just as Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to cut off electricity transmission from Ontario to the U.S. This is largely an Ontario problem. Quebec and points east make almost no use of U.S. natural gas. Canada from Manitoba west and primarily along the southern population ribbon is pretty well served in terms of fossil fuels reserves, refining and distribution of refined products. Central and Atlantic Canada aren't heavily endowed with land-based petroleum resources, and coal is generally too expensive to be competitive. There is refining capacity in Quebec and New Brunswick, which process imported crude oil. Summary and ** link Domestic Supply Lines (and really eliminating provincial trade barriers)** linkThe best solution for long, fragile supply lines - like getting commodities to the Canadian Arctic - is to eliminate those supply lines by producing what is needed locally. For food supplies, see the piece on Food Sovereignty. For energy, shift away from refined fossil fuels like diesel, heating oil and gasoline to renewably-generated electricity backed up with local energy storage (pumped, battery, others), which greatly reduces the cost to communities and residents for electricity from diesel generators and fueling vehicles. (Yes, electric vehicles work in the cold; no fuel lines to freeze up.) Establish an inventory of National Natural Assets including forests, peat lands and wet landsSummary and ** link Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI)Summary and ** link (likely more to come, but it's a start) Water Savers | Econogics Blog | Products and Services | Electric Vehicles | Reducing Your Expenses | Personal Energy Plan | The Emperor's New Hydrogen Economy
This website is powered by renewable energy. |